Sarah “O'” Connor tells the Monetary Occasions why she was mistaken about robots. | Boing Boing

Sarah "O'" Connor tells the Financial Times why she was wrong about robots. | Boing Boing


Sarah Connor was the mom of future human resistance chief John Connor, and the goal of the primary time-traveling assassination by Terminator robots.

Sarah O’Connor is a columnist and affiliate editor on the Financial Times who insists that she is certainly not the fictional character Sarah Connor whilst she talks concerning the inevitable betrayal of the robots.

A possible story.

All jokes apart, O’Connor brings up some fascinating factors concerning the impacts of automation on labor — particularly in warehouses, the place the comfort of automation tends to take precedence over the consolation and dignity of the employees, who’re pressured to accommodate the robots and never the opposite method round:

Robots aren’t changing the picker job fully, as a result of human fingers stay higher than machines at dealing with various objects. “I wrestle to search out the robotic that may be capable to deal with a bag of plaster of Paris, a bit for a jackhammer, a galvanised metal rubbish can, a noticed blade, and a 5-gallon bucket of paint,” one warehouse supervisor defined to researchers at College of California, Berkeley. As an alternative, many warehouse jobs have gotten part-human, part-robot. That is reworking the work, not essentially for the higher.

[…]

If we’re to have robotic colleagues, we have to design processes across the strengths and frailties of the people, with methods for them to voice issues, suggest options, and declare a share of the productiveness positive factors.

Why I was wrong to be optimistic about robots [Sarah O’Connor / The Financial Times]

Picture through YouTube





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *